The Atlantis, is the legendary island that sank into the sea in a single day and night. The story of Atlantis was gotten from the Greek philosopher Plato from two of his writings, Timaeus and Critias. The books date to around 360 BC.
In them, Plato wrote that the Greek sage Solon was given the story in Egypt by a priest. Upon his return, Solon shared the story with his relative Dropides. Then Dropides passed it down to his son Critias, who told his grandson, also named Critias, who finally shared it with the philosopher Socrates and others who were present.
This list should not be taken as historical fact but as a true account of what Plato wrote. Whether we decide to believe in the legend is our own choice.
The Location Of Atlantis
A popular legend says that Santorini is Atlantis, while others believe that the waters off Bimini are hiding a road to the lost city. However, if we take a good look at Plato’s text, it tells us where the submerged island once stood.
The text reads that Atlantis “came forth out of the Atlantic Ocean.” It goes on to say that “there was an island situated in front of the straits which are by you [referring to ancient Greeks], called the Pillars of Heracles.”
Today, we call these the Straits of Gibraltar, where Spain and Africa are separated by a narrow strip of sea. While not quite GPS coordinates, this narrows the island’s location down from a tourist trap in the Bahamas.
In 2011, University of Hartford archaeologist Richard Freund and his team found “memorial cities,” or cities that were built in the image of Atlantis. The series of cities were found buried in the swamps of Donana National Park, just north of Cadiz, Spain.
As it turns out, Cadiz sits right outside the straits. This has Freund convinced that the real Atlantis was buried in the mud flats of the Atlantic. His findings match the story’s text that “the sea in those parts is impassable and impenetrable, because there is a shoal of mud in the way; and this was caused by the subsidence of the island.”
Cadiz is also said to be one of the oldest cities still standing in Western Europe. It is believed to have been built by the Phoenicians around 700 BC, but some records claim the city goes as far back as 1100 BC. Greek myth says that the city dates back even before this.
Why is this important? Long ago, the city’s name was Gades. This is convenient since the text tells of an Atlantean prince called Gadeirus by the prehistoric citizens of Gades. He was given the far eastern side of Atlantis.
This part of the island would have faced modern-day Cadiz. That’s why the story says that Cadiz, or Gades, was named after the prince. Of course, Plato wrote all this at least 340 years after the city’s founding, so maybe he was being liberal when he was naming Atlantean princes.
Atlantis Was Named After A Demigod
Most people probably believe that Atlantis got its name from being in the Atlantic Ocean, but the text claims that it is the other way around. As the story goes, Poseidon, the Greek god of the sea, had five pairs of male twins with a mortal Atlantean woman named Cleito.
The god gave each of his 10 sons different portions of the island over which to rule. Gadeirus was the second-eldest of these sons. While he may have had a city in Spain named after him, it was his older twin, Atlas, who would have the glory of being the island’s namesake.
As the firstborn, Atlas had the entire island, and even the surrounding ocean, named after him. His children would also reign over Atlantis forever. Talk about picking favorites.
Half The Story Is Missing
Plato wrote at least two books about Atlantis. Today, we have a complete version of Timaeus, but we do not have a completed copy of Critias.
Critias ends after Zeus, head of the Greek gods, “collected all the gods into their most holy habitation, which, being placed in the center of the world, beholds all created things. And when he had called them together, he spake as follows.” It ends there. Talk about a cliffhanger.
It is not known if Plato left the book incomplete on purpose or if the finished version was lost long ago. Not only are we missing the ending of Critias, but it is thought that Plato wrote, or at least planned to write, a third book on Atlantis called Hermocrates.
There are a couple of facts to support this theory. A line in Critias reads, “Critias, we will grant your request, and we will grant the same by anticipation to Hermocrates, as well as to you and Timaeus.” This suggests that a third account of the story was to be given by Hermocrates.
Also, the names of the three books may contain a hidden message, especially when one looks at the order in which Plato wrote, or would have written, them. Timaeus comes from the Greek tio, meaning “to honor.” Critias comes from the Greek krima, meaning “judgment.”
Lastly, Hermocrates is derived from “Hermes,” the messenger of the Greek gods. Timaeus honors prehistoric Athens for its heroism. Critias presumably ends with Zeus’s judgment of Atlantis. But what message might Hermocrates have delivered?
The answer may lie in what we know about Hermocrates himself. He was a real-life military leader who helped to lead the successful defense of Syracuse against Athens during the Peloponnesian War. This is much like the story of Atlantis. In the story, an Athenian state from archaic times repels an attack from the superior force of Atlantis.
Maybe the message in Hermocrates would have touched on why Athens’ attack on Syracuse failed and how Syracuse was able to defend itself from conquest. Unless someone finds a copy of this book, we may never know the whole story of Atlantis.
Atlantis Would Be At Least 11,500 Years Old
Solon was said to be the wisest of all Greek sages. The text states that the story of Atlantis was handed down to Solon in Egypt when he wanted to “draw” one of the priests to speak about their oldest of tales.
To do this, Solon decided to tell the priests about the oldest Greek stories he could recall. He spoke to them about a great flood and about the first man. After listening to Solon, one priest responded, “O Solon, Solon . . . there is not an old man among you . . . in mind you are all young; there is no old opinion handed down among you by ancient tradition.”
The priest went on to say that Athens, Solon’s home city, was much older than he thought it was. In the Egyptian registers at Sais [where they were], it was written that Sais was founded 8,000 years before their own time. It was also recorded there that Athens was founded 1,000 years before Sais and that the Athenians of this time fought off Atlantis.
Solon lived from roughly 630 BC to about 560 BC. If the story is true, then the fall of Atlantis occurred around 9500 BC. This would make Atlantis about as old as Gobekli Tepe, which is dated to around 10,000 BC and is considered to be the world’s first temple by archaeologists today.
The Story Is True . . . According To Plato
As it was earlier stated that no one should take this list as a historical account. In the text, however, Critias claims that his story is true. “Then listen . . . to a tale which, though strange, is certainly true, having been attested by Solon.” To which Socrates responds, “Very good. And what is this ancient famous action of the Athenians, which Critias declared, on the authority of Solon, to be not a mere legend, but an actual fact?”
It is important to note that Plato discerns fact from fiction in his story. “There is a story . . . that once upon a time, Paethon, the son of Helios, having yoked the steeds in his father’s chariot, because he was not able to drive them in the path of his father, burned up all that was upon the Earth, and was himself destroyed by a thunderbolt. Now this has the form of a myth, but really signifies a declination of the bodies moving in the heavens around the Earth.”
Here, Plato acknowledges that some myths are symbolic in nature. However, he states in his book that Atlantis was real, not a myth. If Atlantis was Plato’s fantasy, why would he assert that the story of Atlantis was true but have no problem saying that a Greek myth was created to represent something else?
Did Plato believe his own story? Did he want his readers to think it was true? Maybe he was trying to throw his readers off the trail of a message hidden deep within the story. That would be some seriously ancient reverse psychology at work.
Atlantis Was An Empire
Most of us probably think of a lush green island surrounded by deep blue ocean waters when we picture Atlantis. While the story focuses on the island, most of us probably assumed that Atlantis was no more than this. But Plato tells us that Atlantis was actually an empire ruled from this island.
“Now in this island of Atlantis, there was a great and wonderful empire which had rule over the whole island and several others, and over parts of the continent, and, furthermore, the men of Atlantis had subjected the parts of Libya within the columns of Heracles as far as Egypt, and of Europe as far as Tyrrhenia.”
Tyrrhenia is another name for Etruria, now known as central Italy. This means that Atlantis would have stretched as far as modern-day Tuscany in Europe and all the way to Egypt in Africa. We wish we knew how Athens beat such a big empire? Maybe Plato had no idea either, so he gave up on writing the ending.
Ancient Mediterranean People May Have Known About The Americas
While it is possible that Plato made up Atlantis for philosophy’s sake, there is one part of the story that would have been very hard to fabricate. In the story, the Egyptian priest tells Solon, “The island was the way to other islands, and from these you might pass to the whole of the opposite continent which surrounded the true ocean. The surrounding land may be most truly called a boundless continent.”
So there was a continent on the other side of the Atlantic that was so big that it seemed to surround the entire ocean. Could this mean that ancient Greeks, and possibly ancient Egyptians, knew about or had even been to the Americas?
In 1970, famous seafarer Thor Heyerdahl set sail with a crew of six in a reed ship named the Ra II. They sailed from Safi, Morocco, across the Atlantic, and to Barbados in 57 days.
The voyage proved that reed boats could survive ocean travel and that ancient people could actually cross the Atlantic in them. This feat had once been thought impossible by scholars.
However, this does not prove that Egyptians, or Greeks for that matter, made it to the Americas. But Heyerdahl proved that it was at least possible for them to do so.
Plato May Have Wanted To Keep People Out Of The Ocean
If the Greeks did know what lay beyond the Mediterranean, would they have wanted other people to know as well? Maybe not, and this might have been why Plato wrote that no one could sail into the Atlantic.
“But afterward there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body sank into the Earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths of the sea.” According to Plato, this caused an impassable mud shoal outside the Straits of Gibraltar.
This may have stopped some from going too far beyond the straits. Plato implied that the Atlantic was not able to be sailed into during his lifetime when he wrote, “For in those days the Atlantic was navigable.”
Was Plato trying to keep people from going into the Atlantic? Did he truly believe that a shoal of mud was blocking ocean travel? Or was the Atlantic really too muddy for boats to sail across at one point? If it was too shallow for boats, why wouldn’t they just walk across?
The Many Times Mankind Has Been And Will Be Destroyed
The Egyptian priest had told Solon that none of his stories were “truly ancient” compared to his own. According to the priest, the reason for Solon’s lack of “truly ancient” knowledge is that mankind has been destroyed time and time again.
“There have been, and will be again, many destructions of mankind arising out of many causes; the greatest have been brought about by the agencies of fire and water, and other lesser ones by innumerable other causes.”
The priest explains further, “When, on the other hand, the gods purge the Earth with a deluge of water, the survivors in your country are herdsmen and shepherds who dwell on the mountains.”
If the only people to survive were mountain dwellers who had no knowledge of their distant past, then it is easy to see how an entire civilization’s history would be lost in time.
The priest believes that Egypt survived these disasters when almost no one else did because Egypt received very little, if any, rain. Instead, they received annual floods from the Nile River which raised enough to provide for them but not enough to destroy their world.
